USPTO serial 78294317
CLASSIC POOH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLASSIC POOH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Plotkin
Steven Plotkin The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetCorporate Legal- Trademark DepartmentBurbank, CA 91521-0643Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dinnerware; glassware; beverageware; household containers; coasters not of paper and not being table linen; removable insulators for drink cans and bottles; lunch kits consisting of lunch boxes and insulated containers; trays; hair brushes and hair combs; toothbrushes; plastic cups; cookie jars; tea kettles; paper cups; paper plates; wind chimes; trivets; soap dishes; figurines of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, porcelain, and terra cotta | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |