Drawing for CLASSIC POOH

USPTO serial 78294332

CLASSIC POOH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC POOH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Plotkin

Steven Plotkin THE WALT DISNEY COMPANYCorporate Legal- Trademark Department500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0643

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Athletic bags; baby backpacks; backpacks; all-purpose athletic bags; beach bags; book bags; diaper bags; duffel bags; gym bags; tote bags; coin purses; fanny packs; knapsacks; waist packs; leather, mesh and textile shopping bags; umbrellas; wallets; luggage; handbags and pursesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance