USPTO serial 78294756
VINTAGE COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VINTAGE COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Dweck
JEFFREY DWECK THE LAW FIRM OF JEFFREY S. DWECK, PCSTE 1013100 W 33RD STNEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Artificial eyelashes and fingernails; non-medicated bath salts; blusher; bubble bath; cologne; cosmetics, namely, compacts and pencils; creams, namely, body, cold, and eye; emery boards; enamel for nails; eye shadow and liner; gels, namely, bath, hair, shaving, shower and tooth; non-medicated lip balm; lip gloss; lipstick; lotions, namely, skin, hair, facial, and body; makeup, namely, eye, facial and foundation; mascara; nail care preparations; nail enamel; nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter; nail hardeners; nail polish; false nails; oils, namely, bath, body and massage; pencils, namely, cosmetic, eye and eyebrow; perfume; powder, namely, baby, bath, body, face, talcum and non-medicated foot; rouge; soap, namely, deodorant, skin and toilet; liquid soaps for hands, face and body; sun block and screen preparations | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |