USPTO serial 78296448
DEEP DISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3240325Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEEP DISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita Odin
BEAUTYBANK INC ESTEE LAUDER INC767 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; fragrances for personal use; non-medicated skincare preparations; haircare preparations; toiletries, namely bath and body soaps, cleansers, gels, lotions, creams and sprays; suncare preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 7, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |