USPTO serial 78296659
PHOEF SUTTON PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHOEF SUTTON PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary S. Phillips, Esq.
GARY S PHILLIPS ESQ LAW OFFICES OF GARY S PHILLIPS9401 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1100BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production and distribution of motion pictures and television programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |