Drawing for SIMPLY ACCOUNTING CRM

USPTO serial 78296925

SIMPLY ACCOUNTING CRM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY ACCOUNTING CRM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chanette Armstrong

Chanette Armstrong SAGE SOFTWARE, INC.6561 Irvine Center DriveIrvine, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for collecting, managing and analyzing sales data and customer demographics, marketing automation, data reporting and analysis, automation of sales processes, customer support management and automation, data mining, and related customer relationship management applications, namely sales forecasting, calendaring, scheduling and task management, and contact management and manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE
035On-line business management consultation and business evaluation services, namely, providing computer databases for the management and evaluation of customers and potential customers in the field of businessACTIVE
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software and non-downloadable computer programs for collecting, managing and analyzing sales data and customer demographics, marketing automation, data reporting and analysis, automation of sales processes, customer support management and automation, data mining, and related customer relationship management applications, namely sales forecasting, calendaring, scheduling and task management, and contact managementACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 13, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 21, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 14, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 17, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 23, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 6, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2006WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Feb 15, 2006WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 24, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 2, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 25, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance