Drawing for OFFERMAKER

USPTO serial 78297082

OFFERMAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OFFERMAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry L. Kelmachter

BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, PCSTE 1201900 CHAPEL STNEW HAVEN, CT 06510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning promotional offers to retail storesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, creating, maintaining, and operating Internet site for receiving and processing electronic files of promotional offers submitted to offer database for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance