USPTO serial 78297131
TU CASA HECHA REALIDAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TU CASA HECHA REALIDAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey P. Thennisch
JEFFREY P THENNISCH DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH PC29 W LAWRENCE ST STE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Mortgage banking services, real estate time-sharing and real estate management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |