Drawing for POD

USPTO serial 78297930

POD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Russell Tarleton

E RUSSELL TARLETON SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Nylon, Polyester Fabric, or Meshed Filter tea bags filled with teaABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 14, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 14, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 2, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 6, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 19, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance