Drawing for THE SOUND OF CHILDREN LEARNING

USPTO serial 78297947

THE SOUND OF CHILDREN LEARNING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2940898Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 12, 2005
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE SOUND OF CHILDREN LEARNING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian D. Kaul

BRIAN D KAUL WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY900 2ND AVE S STE 1400 INTERNATIOMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Vocalizing assist devices, namely non-electronic devices for assisting a user to hear him or herself vocalizingSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 28, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 4, 2004GNPASU - EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2004SPEASU - EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 24, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 24, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance