USPTO serial 78299775
JOEL SILVERMAN'S COMPANIONS FOR LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOEL SILVERMAN'S COMPANIONS FOR LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clarita, CA
Santa Clarita, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SHAMPOOS, SOAPS AND CONDITIONERS FOR PETS AND STAIN REMOVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | INSECTICIDAL SOAPS FOR PETS; FEED SUPPLEMENTS IN THE NATURE OF VITAMINS FOR PETS, PET PESTICIDAL POWDER AND PET PESTICIDAL SHAMPOO; VETERINARY PREPARATIONS IN THE FORM OF SPRAY TO BE USED ON ANIMALS TO PREVENT CHEWING AND BITING; FLEA AND TICK ERADICATION PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FIPRONIL AND METHOPRENE; MEDICATED SOLUTIONS, NAMELY, DIPS TO CONTROL FLEAS AND TICKS; INSECTICIDAL COLLARS FOR PETS, NAMELY, FLEA COLLARS; FLEA AND TICK CARPET POWDER; HAIR BALL REMEDIES FOR PETS; WORMERS FOR PETS, NAMELY MEDICATED PREPARATIONS TO RID PETS OF DIGESTIVE TRACT PARASITES | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | PET PEDICURE IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, NAIL CLIPPERS AND NAIL FILES; AND HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, SCOOPERS FOR PICKING UP PET EXCREMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRICAL MECHANISM FOR ATTRACTING AND TRAPPING FLEAS; WHISTLES FOR CALLING PETS, NAMELY, DOG WHISTLES; A SERIES OF PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES AND AUDIO TAPES ABOUT BIRDS, CATS AND DOGS; AND COMPUTER AND VIDEO GAMES ABOUT BIRDS, CATS AND DOGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MAGAZINES RELATING TO PETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | PET COLLARS AND PET LEADS; PET CLOTHING; AND RAWHIDE CHEWS FOR DOGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | PRE-FABRICATED DOGHOUSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PET CUSHIONS AND PILLOWS; AND PORTABLE BEDS FOR PETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BIRD CAGES AND THE STANDS THEREFOR; BIRD CAGE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SANDED PERCH COVERS AND GRAVEL PAPER FOR BIRD CAGES; CAGES FOR PETS; NON-METAL CARRYING CONTAINERS FOR PETS; PET FEEDING BOWLS AND DISHES; GROOMING BRUSHES AND COMBS; LITTER BOXES AND LITTER PANS; PLASTIC WATER BOTTLES FOR PETS SOLD EMPTY, PLASTIC PET FOOD CAN COVERS; BIRD BATHS NOT BEING STRUCTURES, BIRD FOOD AND WATER CUPS AND NON-ABRASIVE LINER BAGS FOR PET LITTER PANS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, PET TOYS MADE OF RUBBER AND VINYL | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | LITTER FOR PETS; PET FOOD, EDIBLE PET TREATS AND DOG BISCUITS, EDIBLE PET SNACKS, PET BEVERAGES; CUTTLEBONE FOR BIRDS AND CEDAR SHAVINGS FOR USE AS ANIMAL LITTER AND BEDDING FOR PET | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF AN ON-GOING SERIES OF TELEVISION AND RADIO SHOWS ABOUT ANIMALS, BIRDS AND PETS; LIVE ANIMAL, BIRD AND PET SHOWS; AND PROVIDING THEME PARK EXHIBITS ABOUT ANIMALS, BIRDS AND PETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Silverman, Joel
- Other trademarks owned by Silverman, Joel
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named JOEL SILVERMAN'S COMPANIONS FOR LIFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |