Drawing for SPARKLING COW

USPTO serial 78299921

SPARKLING COW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3008547Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 25, 2005
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPARKLING COW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LINDA S. MENSCH

THE DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP22 RIVERSIDE WATERY LANEDUBLIN,IRELAND

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032CARBONATED, MINERAL AND AERATED FLAVORED NONALCOHOLIC MILK BASED BEVERAGESSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDSep 5, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Oct 17, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 9, 2008CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Jul 30, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 25, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 2, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 13, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 26, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 17, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance