USPTO serial 78299921
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP, THE
DUBLIN, IE
Other trademarks owned by DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP, THE
DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP, THE
DUBLIN, IE
Other trademarks owned by DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP, THE
DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP, THE
DUBLIN, IE
Other trademarks owned by DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP, THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA S. MENSCH
THE DIANE KROLL AND THOMAS BERBAS PARTNERSHIP22 RIVERSIDE WATERY LANEDUBLIN,IRELAND| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | CARBONATED, MINERAL AND AERATED FLAVORED NONALCOHOLIC MILK BASED BEVERAGES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 5, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |