USPTO serial 78300480
FILESECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FILESECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cupertino, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE DESIGNED FOR DATA STORAGE, MANAGEMENT, OR COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS TO PROVIDE SECURITY, INCLUDING ENCRYPTION AND DECRYPTION, MANAGEMENT OF ENCRYPTION KEYS, AUTHENTICATION, INTEGRITY, NON-REPUDIATION, FILE "SHREDING", DOCUMENT OR FILE MANAGEMENT, AND TRACKING OF INFORMATION ACCESS AND USE FUNCTIONALITIES; FOR FILES AND DATA SETS INCLUDING TEXT, DATA, GRAPHICS, SOUND, VIDEO, OR ANY OTHER FORMS OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION; AND FOR THE SECURE TRANSMISSION OR EXCHANGE OF DATA OR INFORMATION OVER ANY NETWORKS INCLUDING EMAIL OR IN ANY OTHER FORM FOR STORAGE OR TRANSFER INCLUDING CDROMS; IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SECURITY, AND FOR SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING TOOLS AND UTILITIES, AND IN COMPUTER AND USER MANUALS SOLD AND DISTRIBUTED THEREWITH | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |