Drawing for UNCLE BRUTHA'S FIRE SAUCE NO. 9 CHILE VERDE, GARLIC & GINGER

USPTO serial 78300543

UNCLE BRUTHA'S FIRE SAUCE NO. 9 CHILE VERDE, GARLIC & GINGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UNCLE BRUTHA'S FIRE SAUCE NO. 9 CHILE VERDE, GARLIC & GINGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Hot SauceABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jun 10, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 10, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 10, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 1, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 26, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance