USPTO serial 78300837
DRIVEWAY DECOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVEWAY DECOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trevor C. Klotz
TREVOR C KLOTZ PERLEY -ROBERTSON HILL OTTAWA; ONC - ONTARIOK1P 1E290 SPARKS ST 4TH FL,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | ornamental steel fencing, statues of non-precious metal, metal gates, metal trellises, and metal arbors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |