USPTO serial 78301746
COOL FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOL FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT (CPU) COOLERS; HEAT SINKS FOR USE IN COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHICH CREATE UNWANTED HEAT; INTERNAL COOLING FANS FOR COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHICH CREATE UNWANTED HEAT; DUCTS AND PLENUMS TO INTERCONNECT SUCH INTERNAL COOLING FANS AND HEAT SINKS FOR COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHICH CREATE UNWANTED HEAT; AND MOUNTING HARDWARE FOR EACH OF THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |