Drawing for ZONE ICE CREAM

USPTO serial 78301941

ZONE ICE CREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZONE ICE CREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. O'Connell, Jr., Scott L. Allen, Dana Breitman, Soyong Cho, Robert M. Crawford, Jr., John V. Forcier, Andrew L. Jagenow, Ethan Horwitz, P.C., Kevin V. Lam, Ira J. Levy, Shaun E. Ryan, Kenda J. Stewart, Brian L. Wamsley, Robert Blasi, Stephen G. C

Robert M. O'Connell, Jr., Scott L. Allen, Dana Bre Goodwin Procter LLPExchange Place, 53 State StreetAttn: Trademark AdministratorBoston, MA 02109-2881

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030ice cream, frozen yogurt, sorbet, ice cream sandwiches, and frozen confectionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 4, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 21, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Nov 9, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 21, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 26, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance