USPTO serial 78301941
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. O'Connell, Jr., Scott L. Allen, Dana Breitman, Soyong Cho, Robert M. Crawford, Jr., John V. Forcier, Andrew L. Jagenow, Ethan Horwitz, P.C., Kevin V. Lam, Ira J. Levy, Shaun E. Ryan, Kenda J. Stewart, Brian L. Wamsley, Robert Blasi, Stephen G. C
Robert M. O'Connell, Jr., Scott L. Allen, Dana Bre Goodwin Procter LLPExchange Place, 53 State StreetAttn: Trademark AdministratorBoston, MA 02109-2881| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ice cream, frozen yogurt, sorbet, ice cream sandwiches, and frozen confections | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |