Drawing for T-MOBILE GLOBAL HOLDING

USPTO serial 78301971

T-MOBILE GLOBAL HOLDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2922841Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 1, 2005
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T-MOBILE GLOBAL HOLDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Adams

Michael D. Adams Mayer Brown LLPP.O. Box 2828Chicago, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming services for others; rental of software and hardware for online access; services of an internet trust center, namely, assurance and administration of digital keys and/or digital certificates; hosting the web pages of others on an internet computer server; computer services namely, creating indexes of information available on computer networks; design services for others in the fields of information technology, computer programming, telecommunications and global communication networks; consulting services in the field of information technology and computer programming; installation, maintenance and repair of computer softwareSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Aug 1, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Aug 1, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 1, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 15, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 11, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
May 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance