Drawing for MTV2 BASHMENT

USPTO serial 78302325

MTV2 BASHMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MTV2 BASHMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Molko

JOSEPH MOLKO C/O A. ARIES TABIGUE 1515 BROADWAY, 51STVIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing television series highlighting dance hall reggae music as well as reggae-influenced music in other genres featuring live action, comedy and drama; providing information in the field of entertainment rendered via computer by means of a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Oct 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 21, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance