USPTO serial 78302991
ALALAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALALAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk powder, Corn flour, Canned vegetables (peas, corn, beet, etc;), Canned fruits (peaches, pear, fruit cocktail, Canned mushrooms, Tomato paste in glass jars pineapple), Tuna salads, Canned tuna in oil/brine, Sardines, Cream cheese, Sterilized Cream, Chicken stock, Pure ghee, Stuffed cabbage, Stuffed vine leaves, Vine leaves | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pizza sauce, Jam, Mayonnaise, Honey in glass/squeeze jars, Custard powder, Hot sauce, Ketchup in glass bottles/squeeze (plastic) bottle, Pasta, sauce, Crème caramel, Dumpling mix, Cake mixes, Chocolate syrup; Oats | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Strawberry syrup, Instant powder drinks - orange and lemon, Tea bags, Tea CTC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |