Drawing for CASAMIA

USPTO serial 78304030

CASAMIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASAMIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Passler

MARK D PASSLER AKERMAN SENTERFITTPO BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034tobacco, raw or manufactured; smokers' articles, namely cigar tips not of precious metal; matches; chewing tobacco and gutka, namely Indian chewing tobacco mixed with pan masala; cigars and cigarettes; cigarette and cigar holders not of precious metal; cigarette and cigar paper; cigar and cigarette lighters not of precious metal; cigarette and cigar cases not of precious metal; cigarette and cigar filters; cigarette tips; match holders not of precious metal, match boxes not of precious metal; mouth pieces for cigar holders; mouth pieces for cigarette holders; pipe racks for tobacco pipes; tobacco pouches; tobacco jars not of precious metal; cigarette tips not of precious metal, tips for cigarette holders not of precious metal; tips for cigar holders not of precious metal; and ashtrays not of precious metalACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance