USPTO serial 78304464
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Kareff
SCOTT M KAREFF SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely asset management services, investment management services and investment advisory services; Financial services, namely asset management services, investment management services and investment advisory services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |