USPTO serial 78304630
OOBI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OOBI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
MIRIAM D TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS; HAIR DYES AND COLORANTS; HAIR STYLING PRODUCTS NAMELY, GELS, SPRAYS, MOUSSES AND LOTIONS; HAIR WAVING PREPARATIONS; HAIR BLEACHING PRODUCTS; SHAMPOOS; CONDITIONERS; SHAVING PREPARATIONS; NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; COSMETICS, TOILETRIES AND SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, COSMETIC SUN-PROTECTING PREPARATIONS, COSMETIC SUN-TANNING PREPARATIONS, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS, SUN CARE LOTIONS, SUN CREAMS, SUN SCREEN, SUN TAN GEL, SUN TAN LOTION, SUN-BLOCK LOTIONS, AFTER SUN CREAMS AND AFTER SUN LOTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | SCISSORS FOR HAIR | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | GAS HEATED HAIRBRUSHES; GAS-POWERED HEATED HAIR STYLING APPARATUS NAMELY, STRAIGHTENERS, CURLERS, TONGS AND ROLLERS; HEATED HAIR STRAIGHTENERS AND CURLERS; GAS-POWERED CLOTHES IRONS; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | HAIR DRYERS; GAS-POWERED HAIR DRYERS; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS; ACCESSORIES FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS, NAMELY, NOZZLES, DIFFUSERS AND REFILL GAS CARTRIDGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | COMBS AND BRUSHES FOR HAIRDRESSING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Freedom Innovations Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named OOBI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |