Drawing for PIPER JAFFRAY & CO.

USPTO serial 78306247

PIPER JAFFRAY & CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPER JAFFRAY & CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eunice P. de Carvalho

EUNICE P DE CARVALHO FAEGRE & BENSON LLP90 S 7TH ST STE 2200WELLS FARGO CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consultation services in the field of business mergers and acquisitionsACTIVE—
036Automated Securities Brokerage Services; Investment Brokerage Services; Investment Management Services; Mutual Fund Brokerage Services; Securities Brokerage Services; Stock Brokerage Services; Investment Banking Services; Financial Analysis and Consultation Services; Fund Investment Consultation Services; Investment Consultation Services; Financial Management Services; Financial Planning Services; Financial Portfolio Management Services; Financial Research Services; Funds Investment Services; Financial Investment Services in the fields of Securities, Stocks, Mutual Funds, and Annuities; Financial Information Provided by Electronic Means; Investment Advice Services; Investment of Funds for Others; Venture Capital Services, Namely, Providing Financing to Emerging and Start-up Companies; Business Finance Procurement and Consultation Services; and Underwriting Services in the Field of SecuritiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance