USPTO serial 78306463
IHC STAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IHC STAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Simons
Andrew D. Simons Reicker Pfau Pyle & McRoy, LLP1421 State Street, Suite BSanta Barbara, CA 93101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Immunohistochemistry test reagents comprised primarily of diagnostic reagents for detection of normal, cancer and other tumor cells in medical research and clinical specimens | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Immunohistochemistry test kit comprised primarily of an apparatus in the nature of a robotic instrument and related reagents for detection of normal, cancer and other tumor cells in medical research and clinical specimens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELERUS DIAGNOSTICS
- Other trademarks owned by Erickson, Page Andrew
- Other trademarks owned by Erickson, Page Andrew
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IHC STAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |