USPTO serial 78307165
LEG COUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2861822Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2004
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEG COUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING NAMELY HOSIERY, SOCKS, ATHLETIC SOCKS, CASUAL SOCKS, TROUSER SOCKS, PANTYHOSE, KNEE-HIGH HOSIERY, NOVELTY STOCKINGS AND LEGGINGS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |