USPTO serial 78307392
SPORTING WOOD CREATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTING WOOD CREATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lea Hall Speed
LEA HALL SPEED BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELLSTE 2000165 MADISON AVEMEMPHIS, TN 38103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | animal skins and hides; gym bags, hunting bags and bag tags; walking sticks; umbrellas; toiletry kits sold empty; leather key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | furniture, namely, book cases, coat racks, hat racks, display pieces, armoires, entertainment centers, tables, chairs, wall mounted gun racks, free standing gun racks, benches, desks, non-metal boxes and wood boxes, picture frames, shelves, display racks for floor and walls, figurines and cabinet hardware all comprised of wood, horn, antler, tusk and bone; animal tusks, horns and antlers; pillows comprised of animal skins; folding chairs; non-metal and non-leather key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Blanket throws comprised of animal skins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |