Drawing for SLEEPEEZEE OF LONDON BY APPOINTNMENT TO H.M. THE QUEEN BEDDING MANUFACTURERS SLEEPEEZEE LIMITED LONDON BY APPOINTMENT TO H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES BEDDING MANUFACTURERS SLEEPEEZEE LIMITED LONDON ROYAL WARRANTS OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE UNITED KINGD

USPTO serial 78307604

SLEEPEEZEE OF LONDON BY APPOINTNMENT TO H.M. THE QUEEN BEDDING MANUFACTURERS SLEEPEEZEE LIMITED LONDON BY APPOINTMENT TO H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES BEDDING MANUFACTURERS SLEEPEEZEE LIMITED LONDON ROYAL WARRANTS OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE UNITED KINGD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLEEPEEZEE OF LONDON BY APPOINTNMENT TO H.M. THE QUEEN BEDDING MANUFACTURERS SLEEPEEZEE LIMITED LONDON BY APPOINTMENT TO H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES BEDDING MANUFACTURERS SLEEPEEZEE LIMITED LONDON ROYAL WARRANTS OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE UNITED KINGD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna Jakobsson

ANNA JAKOBSSON DONOVAN & YEE LLP110 GREENE ST STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Duvets; mattress protectors, namely, mattress covers and mattress pads; pillow protectors, namely, pillow covers; bed clothing, namely, bed linens; quilts, eiderdowns, pillow cases; bed covers, namely, bedspreadsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 11, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 17, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 16, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance