Drawing for POSTAGE PAID

USPTO serial 78307632

POSTAGE PAID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POSTAGE PAID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER A VAN KIRK

JENNIFER A VAN KIRK LEWIS AND ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal key chains and key ringsACTIVE—
018Leather key chains, cosmetic bags sold empty, bags for women and children, namely, backpacks, messenger bags, coin purses, tote bags, school bags, school book bags, purses, all-purpose sports bags, duffle bags, and overnight luggage and rolling luggageACTIVE—
020Non-metal and non-leather key chains and key rings, and hand-held, personal compact and furniture mirrorsACTIVE—
021Cups, mugs, plates, water bottles sold empty, specialty holders for carrying water bottles, lunch boxes and hair combsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 27, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 11, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2005LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 29, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance