Drawing for GOOD VIBRATIONS

USPTO serial 78307788

GOOD VIBRATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD VIBRATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller and Amanda Laura Nye

SUSAN L HELLER GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP2450 COLORADO AVE STE 400ESANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicle parts, namely, windshields, transmissions, wheels, differentials, fenders, fender flares, drive belts, drive gears, mud guards, running boards; axels, rear and side view mirrors, steering wheels, windshield wipers, shock absorbers, sun visors, suspension struts, ball joints, idler arms, valve stems for vehicle tires, valves for vehicle tires and vehicle dip sticks; vehicle accessories, namely, awnings, motor vehicle alarm systems, motor vehicle back up beepers, motor vehicle power locks, vehicle seats, vehicle seat covers, vehicle tow bars and vehicle roll barsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 6, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 15, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 3, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 3, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 2, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 2, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 6, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance