Drawing for MAVA

USPTO serial 78308016

MAVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3156020Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MAVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrienne L. White, Esq.

FRED W HATHAWAY ESQ BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PCPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, POWER-OPERATED EMULSION SPRAYERS AND SPRAY NOZZLES FOR WASHING AND CLEANING OF CHEMICALS AND OTHER HARMFUL SUBSTANCES OF NUCLEAR POLLUTION, CHEMICAL POLLUTION, BIOLOGICAL POLLUTION, RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION, NUCLEAR WEAPONS, CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
008HAND-OPERATED EQUIPMENT NAMELY, HAND OPERATED EMULSION SPRAYERS FOR WASHING AND CLEANING OF CHEMICALS AND OTHER HARMFUL SUBSTANCES OF NUCLEAR POLLUTION, CHEMICAL POLLUTION, BIOLOGICAL POLLUTION, RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION, NUCLEAR WEAPONS, CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
011DISINFECTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PORTABLE SHOWERS AND SPRAY NOZZLES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST CHEMICALS AND OTHER HARMFUL SUBSTANCES AS WELL AS AGAINST NUCLEAR POLLUTION, CHEMICAL POLLUTION, BIOLOGICAL POLLUTION, RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION, NUCLEAR WEAPONS, CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AND FOR DECONTAMINATIONSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 17, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 20, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance