Drawing for INTEGRITY ALIGNMENT

USPTO serial 78308048

INTEGRITY ALIGNMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2970009Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2005
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INTEGRITY ALIGNMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services, namely, providing strategic planning services and business information about business communications, all relating to business ethics and the promotion of corporate and cultural standardsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 2002
041Providing training services, namely, organizing and conducting classes, seminars, educational demonstrations, workshops, motivational speakers and programs in the fields of business ethics and business guidelines, and corporate cultural standards and corporate cultural guidelinesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 31, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Aug 31, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 29, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 19, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance