USPTO serial 78308377
IMAGING CYCLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IMAGING CYCLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Meltec Multi-Epitope-Ligand-Technologies GmbH
Magdeburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Meltec Multi-Epitope-Ligand-Technologies GmbH
MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
MAGDEBURG, DE
Other trademarks owned by MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
MAGDEBURG, DE
Other trademarks owned by MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
MAGDEBURG, DE
Other trademarks owned by MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
MUNCHEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis T. Isaf
Louis T. Isaf WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE LLPP.O. BOX 7037ATLANTA, GA 30357-0037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Apparatus and instruments for scientific research in laboratories, namely, protein purifiers, 2D-gel electrophoresis apparatus, high-speed centrifuges, gel documentation apparatus, cell-culture incubators and sterile-flow hoods, DNA-electrophoresis chambers, PCR machines and freezers, cameras, and digital cameras; analysis devices, namely, immunofluorescence microscopes, UV-vis spectrometers, FACS (fluorescence activated cell sorter), fluorescence gel scanners, microplate readers; ] computer software used for data mining, picture recognition, and database management in the fields of human, animal [ and plant ] cell and cell surfaces, and in the field of protein research | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research in the field of human, animal [ and plant ] cells and cell surfaces; research in the field of proteins; research in the field of medicines; database development services for others in the field of human, animal [ and plant ] cells and cell surfaces and proteins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meltec Multi-Epitope-Ligand-Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
- Other trademarks owned by MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
- Other trademarks owned by MPB MELTEC PATENT-UND BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
- Other trademarks owned by TOPOSNOMOS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IMAGING CYCLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 24, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 24, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 7, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |