USPTO serial 78308445
SST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Nataupsky
STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP14TH FL2040 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, spinal fixation systems consisting primarily of implants composed of artificial materials and surgical instruments, namely, bone screws, bone implants, cannulae, rods, rod inserters, rod reducers, guidewires, distractors, speculums, and rod deployment instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |