USPTO serial 78308747
FLASH CART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLASH CART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE FIELDS OF WEB DEVELOPMENT FOR MULTIMEDIA BUSINESS TO BUSINESS AND BUSINESS TO CONSUMER WEB SITES AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC TO E-COMMERCE AND WEB SITES | ABANDONED | Jan 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |