Drawing for Serial No. 78308889

USPTO serial 78308889

Serial No. 78308889

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 78308889?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tawnya R. Wojciechowski

TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP12544 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-3051UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software system for facilitating business transactions, namely electronic and non-electronic cash registers, time clocks, automated teller machines and point-of-sale terminals for use in dispensing cash and non-cash items, depositing of funds, payments of checks, and consummating a variety of electronic transfers of funds, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, computers, telephones and digital data processors; automatic vending machines, calculating machines, namely electronic cash registers, data processing equipment, namely, data processors and computers; magnetic pre-recorded cards, containing financial data, magnetic identity cards, containing identification data; microprocessors; magnetic data carriers containing recorded information and data related to electronic payments; computer software for the management of scannable product files and data; namely, file maintenance and pricing software for cash registers; computer software for use in operating cash registers, inventory management, and accounting, computer software utilities, computer software for text processing; computer software providing interfaces to a variety of point-of-sale devices for automatically transferring sales data from the point-of-sale to a central computer, for generating reports, for sending price look-up data (PLUs), UPCs, departments and prices to cash registers, and for monitoring sales, purchase and inventory, for use in automating a store and the store manager's daily activities; payroll servicesACTIVE—
036Financial processing services, namely electronic cash transaction processing, credit card processingACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of banking and financial information, communications by telephone by reception or by emission, by voice response and by electronic means; electronic transmission of secured messages and images by computer terminalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance