Drawing for VANGUARD

USPTO serial 78308959

VANGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VANGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Albert Riddle

J ALBERT RIDDLE BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED3900 ESSEX LN #1200HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007complete electrical submersible pump system used in the oil, gas and water well industry, excluding hydraulic pumps, for producing hydrocarbons and/or water from a borehole comprising electric submersible pumps, variable speed controllers, horizontal pumps, electric submersible motors, electric submersible seals, rotary gas separators, electrical submersible pump cables, downhole oil/water separators, electronic sizing and pricing software programs, and electric submersible progressive cavity pumps, and parts thereof with additional engineering, testing, quality control and documentation designed to improve run lifeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 19, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 19, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 30, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 3, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance