Drawing for VERIKID

USPTO serial 78309237

VERIKID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERIKID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P. Cernota

Andrew P. Cernota Vern Maine & Associates100 Main St., Ste.2PO Box 3445Nashua, NH 03061

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC DEVICE, NAMELY MICROCHIPS FOR LOCATING AND IDENTIFYING MISSING OR ABDUCTED CHILDREN; IMPLANTABLE AND/OR ATTACHABLE ELECTRONIC TRANSPONDER OR MICROCHIP FOR CONTROL, IDENTIFICATION, AND MONITORING OF CHILDREN IN DAYCARE/CHILDREN FACILITIES, SHOPPING CENTERS, HOSPITALS, AND PUBLIC, PRIVATE AND RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES SO AS TO PREVENT ABDUCTION, ABUSE, OR LOSS OF CHILDREN; ELECTRONIC DEVICE, NAMELY, MICROCHIP THAT STORES, TRANSMITS, AND RECEIVERS IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION, MEDICAL DATA, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION IN ORDER TO MONITOR AND MANAGE CHILDREN, INCLUDING THE MONITORING OF THE STATUS OF MEDICAL DEVICES, PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS, IDENTIFICATION, MEDICAL DATA AND GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF THOSE CHILDREN; PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MICROCHIP AND ASSOCIATED COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MEASURING, COLLECTING, STORING, AND TRANSMITTING, PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS, MEDICAL DATA, CHILDREN INFORMATION, STATUS OF MEDICAL DEVICES, AND GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, A WIRELESS MICROCHIP IN THE NATURE OF DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS THAT IS ATTACHABLE AND/OR IMPLANTABLE ON CHILDREN, FOR TRANSMITTING GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION, IDENTIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS, MEDICAL HISTORY, AND STATUS OF MEDICAL DEVICES FROM THE CHILDREN TO A CONTROL PROCESSING INFORMATION CENTER USING SCANNING TECHNOLOGY AND SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY AND/OR ANY OTHER GROUND TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGYACTIVE—
038PROVIDING A COMMUNICATION LINK FROM CHILDREN TO A CENTRAL LOCATION, NAMELY, PROVIDING SATELLITE OR TERRESTRIAL TRANSMISSION AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND/OR WIRELESS, FIXED WIRE OR GROUND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRANSMISSION, NAMELY, PROVIDING TRANSMISSIONS OF DIGITAL DATA COMMUNICATED FROM A MICROCHIP TO A CENTRAL LOCATION FOR IDENTIFICATION, GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION, AND MEASURING PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN ORDER TO ALLOW MONITORING, COLLECTING, LOCATING, REVIEWING, COMPARING, INTERPRETING, ANALYZING, DIAGNOSING, AND STORING OF HEALTH PARAMETERS AND STATUS OF MEDICAL DEVICES AND FOR MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH EDUCATION; PROVIDING A LOCAL COMMUNICATION LINK FROM CHILDREN TO A CENTRAL COMPUTER, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF DATA OBTAINED BY SCANNING A MICROCHIP AND RETRIEVING IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION, GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; PROVIDING A COMMUNICATION LINK FROM CHILDREN TO A CENTRAL LOCATION FOR LOCATING AND MONITORING GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF MISSING OR ABDUCTED CHILD BY MEANS OF AN IMPLANTABLE AND/OR ATTACHABLE MICROCHIP, CONTROL, IDENTIFICATION, AND MONITORING OF CHILDREN IN DAYCARE, CHILDCARE, SHOPPING, HOSPITALS, AND PUBLIC, PRIVATE AND RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES SO AS TO PREVENT ABDUCTION, ABUSE, OR LOSS OF CHILDREN BY MEANT OF IMPLANTABLE AND/OR ATTACHABLE ELECTRONIC TRANSPONDER OR MICROCHIPACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 12, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 12, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 7, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 20, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance