USPTO serial 78309438
POST-N-TRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3030820Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POST-N-TRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth M Seltzer
Elizabeth M Seltzer Driscoll & Seltzer, PLLC300 N. Washington StreetSuite 304Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for permitting the direct electronic transmission and exchange of health insurance claims information between providers of medical care and payers of medical benefits and health insurance claims, including commercial insurers, governmental payers of such claims and other entities involved in reimbursing costs of medical care and health services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 6, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |