USPTO serial 78310384
S & W
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S & W?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Kevin Grogan, Esq.
SUSAN DALY STEARNS GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP2375 E CAMELBACK RD STE 700PHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toiletries, such as Body Spray; Eau de Cologne; Eau de Toilette; Eau de Parfum; Perfume; After Shave; After Shave Splash; After Shave Gel; After Shave Balm; Pre Shave; Refreshing Spray; Relaxing Spray; Stimulating Spray; Vitalizing Spray; Bath Oil; Bath Soap; Shower Gel; Body Shampoo; Deodorant Spray; Refreshing Tissues; Bath Crystals; Milk Bath; Dusting Powder; Body Lotion; Body Splash; Body Cream; Hand Lotion; Talc; Cleanser; Toner; Face Cream; Day Cream; Night Cream; Eye Cream; Eye Makeup Remover; Neck Cream; Masks; Lip Cream; Lipstick; Lip Balm; Hand Cream; Shaving Foam; Shaving Cream; Body Shampoo; Body Glimmer Products; Exfoliating Cleansing Cream; Cleansing Bar for the Body; Cream Bath; Massage Oil; Massage Cream; Refreshing Oil; Refreshing Cream; Stimulating Oil; Stimulating Cream; Vitalizing Oil; Vitalizing Cream; Hair Shampoo; Hair Conditioner; Hair Toner; Deodorants; Antiperspirants; Teeth whitening products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |