USPTO serial 78310538
KNOWNAUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KNOWNAUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
La Crescenta, CA
La Crescenta, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer search engine software for accessing location-specific geographically tagged data with a proprietary metafile | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |