Drawing for POP

USPTO serial 78311424

POP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Baum and Amy L. Nelkin

KARIN SEGALL AND ANDREW BAUM DARBY & DARBY P.C.P.O. BOX 770, CHURCH STREET STATIONNEW YORK, NY 10008-0770UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer software for use in shipping management, port operations and in client/principal relationship management; computer software for use in recordal of data including pre-arrival, arrival and departure data and voyage management data for shipping and shipments; computer software for use in accounting and financial management; computer software for use in information management and business applications for the shipping and marine services industries; computer software for accessing information databases and on-line services using the internet, intranet, extranet or other computer networksACTIVE—
035Compilation and dissemination of accounting information via the internet, intranet, extranet or other computer networks; providing online computer databases containing accounting information; accounting management; information management services, namely, compilation and dissemination of shipping information and port operations information, namely, docking and ship processing, port maintenance, port administration, port policy, navigational safety management, traffic management, cargo and shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, tracking documents, via the internet, intranet and extranet or other computer networksACTIVE—
036Compilation and dissemination of financial information via the internet, intranet, extranet or other computer networks; financial managementACTIVE—
038Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data containing accounting and financial information via a global computer information network; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data containing shipping information and port operations information via a global computer information network; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data containing accounting and financial information and shipping information and port operations information via a global computer information network to both clients and principals, namely, those with an interest in the cargo and those with an interest in the vesselACTIVE—
039Providing online computer databases containing shipping information and port operations informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 8, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance