Drawing for ENDLESS SUMMER

USPTO serial 78311439

ENDLESS SUMMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ENDLESS SUMMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Keller; Geoffrey D. Aurini

PAUL A KELLER GEOFFREY D AURINI HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCPO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal swimming poolsACTIVE—
040custom manufacture of swimming pools, swimming pool liners and related accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 28, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 22, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 7, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance