USPTO serial 78312015
WOOSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WOOSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Logsdon, Reg. No. 22,132
WILLIAM H LOGSDON REG NO 22 132 WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology services; Planning, researach, development, design, testing, monitoring, inspection and anlaysis in relation to telecommunications equipment and telecommunications services; Development, design and customization of computer software and systems; Provision of access to computer systems and networks including the internet; Provision of remote access to a central archive of data, information and software applications, including the warehousing of data, information and software applications and real time downloads of data, information and software applications; Web page design, authoring and hosting; Internet café services; Security services, guarding services and monitoring of alarms; Software maintenance and support; Systems integration services; Platform design and maintenance; Customer identification in electronic commerce; Domain name registry services; Rental and leasing of apparatus and equipment for all the aforesaid and parts, accessories and fittings for the same; Advice, consultancy, technical support services and information relating to all the aforesaid; Information technology services; Planning, researach, development, design, testing, monitoring, inspection and anlaysis in relation to telecommunications equipment and telecommunications services; Development, design and customization of computer software and systems; Provision of access to computer systems and networks including the internet; Provision of remote access to a central archive of data, information and software applications, including the warehousing of data, information and software applications and real time downloads of data, information and software applications; Web page design, authoring and hosting; Internet café services; Security services, guarding services and monitoring of alarms; Software maintenance and support; Systems integration services; Platform design and maintenance; Customer identification in electronic commerce; Domain name registry services; Rental and leasing of apparatus and equipment for all the aforesaid and parts, accessories and fittings for the same; Advice, consultancy, technical support services and information relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |