USPTO serial 78312793
GARDEN SHADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GARDEN SHADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tiffany A. Parcher
Tiffany A. Parcher CHRISTIE, PARKER AND HALE, LLPP.O. BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | PREFABRICATED TEMPORARY STRUCTURES, MAINLY, PREFABRICATED TEMPORARY SHEDS, GARAGES, GAZEBOS, CARPORTS, AND SHADE COVERS HAVING METALLIC FRAMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2004 |
| 019 | PREFABRICATED TEMPORARY NON-METAL STRUCTURES, NAMELY, SHEDS, GARAGES, GAZEBOS, CARPORTS AND SHADE COVERS HAVING FABRIC OR CANVAS FRAME COVERINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2004 |
| 022 | TENTS AND CANOPIES WITH CANVAS COVERING FOR OUTDOOR USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caravan Canopy International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Caravan Canopy International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named GARDEN SHADE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |