USPTO serial 78313276
TOP DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOP DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen A. Jeffers, Esq.
KAREN A JEFFERS ESQ JEFFERS & IRELAND, PROFESSIONAL55 WALLS DRFAIRFIELD, CT 06824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Concession stands, retail kiosks, roving vendor services featuring foods, beverages, souvenirs, novelties and/or sundries | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |