USPTO serial 78314206
TANGO BUSINESS SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TANGO BUSINESS SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carlsbad, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tawnya R. Wojciechowski
TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP12544 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-3051UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software system for facilitating business transactions, namely electronic and non-electronic cash registers, time clocks, automated teller machines and point-of-sale terminals for use in dispensing cash and non-cash items, depositing of funds, payments of checks, and consummating a variety of electronic transfers of funds, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, computers, telephones and digital data processors; automatic vending machines, calculating machines, namely electronic cash registers, data processing equipment, namely, data processors and computers; magnetic pre-recorded cards, containing financial data, magnetic identity cards, containing identification data; microprocessors; magnetic data carriers containing recorded information and data related to electronic payments; computer software for the management of scannable product files and data; namely, file maintenance and pricing software for cash registers; computer software for use in operating cash registers, inventory management, and accounting, computer software utilities, computer software for text processing; computer software providing interfaces to a variety of point-of-sale devices for automatically transferring sales data from the point-of-sale to a central computer, for generating reports, for sending price look-up data (PLUs), UPCs, departments and prices to cash registers, and for monitoring sales, purchase and inventory, for use in automating a store and the store manager's daily activities; payroll services | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Payroll services, namely, payroll preparation services, payroll processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Payroll tax debiting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of banking and financial information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |