Drawing for BACKYARD APPLE

USPTO serial 78314423

BACKYARD APPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACKYARD APPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032flavored brewed malt-based alcoholic beverages in the nature of beerACTIVE—
033flavored alcoholic malt coolersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance