USPTO serial 78314998
ZIIING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3261843Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIIING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Cherskov
JOSEPH MORELLI2939 N KOLMAR AVECHICAGO, IL 60641UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | May 11, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2011 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |