Drawing for LITHGOW PALOOZA

USPTO serial 78315094

LITHGOW PALOOZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITHGOW PALOOZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary S. Phillips, Esq.

GARY S PHILLIPS ESQ LAW OFFICES OF GARY S PHILLIPS9401 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1100BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2924UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and video recordings of musical, dramatic and comedic performancesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, tank tops, shirts, blouses, sweatshirts, sweaters, jackets, scarves, caps and hatsACTIVE—
028Playthings, namely, plush animal toys, dolls, toy figures and action figuresACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, live, televised, and movie appearances by professional and amateur entertainers and dramatic and comedic performances associated therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance